Vibe-Coding The Daily Token: Building Satirical News with AI
Published on 23.01.2026
Vibe-Coding The Daily Token: Building Satirical News with AI
TLDR
A developer built a satirical news website called "The Daily Token" using AI coding tools, demonstrating how to leverage different AI models for specific tasks in a cohesive workflow.
The Birth of The Daily Token
TLDR: A satirical news website was created to parody the loss of free Grok Code access, built using AI coding tools in just two hours.
When free access to Grok Code Fast was ending, a developer decided to create a satirical news website called "The Daily Token" to cover the "crisis" of losing free AI access in a breaking news format. Rather than mourning the change, the approach was to meme the situation with a professionally executed Onion-style parody.
The project began with Kilo Code in Architect Mode using Claude Sonnet 4.5 to create a plan for a satirical news website. The developer used the "enhance prompt" feature to generate a comprehensive design plan that included HTML structure, CSS classes, and key design elements to achieve a serious news site aesthetic with red accents and professional typography.
The approach demonstrated the power of using AI tools for rapid prototyping - the developer was building not just a joke site, but a professionally executed joke site. This shows how AI coding tools can be leveraged for creative projects that might otherwise be too time-consuming to pursue manually.
For architects and teams building with AI tools, this demonstrates the importance of using the right model for each specific task in the development process.
Key takeaways:
- AI coding tools enable rapid prototyping of creative projects
- Professional execution can enhance even satirical content
- Different AI models excel at different development tasks
Tradeoffs: Projects can be built faster with AI assistance but require understanding of how to orchestrate different models effectively.
Link: How I Vibe-Coded The Daily Token with Grok Code
Orchestrator Mode and Model-Specific Tasks
TLDR: Different AI models were used for specific tasks - Sonnet for planning, Grok for implementation, and Opus for writing.
The development process utilized a sophisticated workflow that leveraged different AI models for their strengths:
-
Architect Mode with Claude Sonnet 4.5: Used for planning and creating comprehensive design plans with detailed HTML structure, CSS classes, and design elements.
-
Orchestrator Mode delegating to Grok Code Fast 1: Handled implementation tasks like creating HTML structure based on the design plan. The orchestrator mode handled switching between larger, more expensive models for planning and delegating specific tasks to cheaper models for implementation.
-
Claude Opus 4.1: Used for writing satirical content due to its strength in deadpan delivery and absurdist humor, creating headlines like "Token Hoarding Reaches Record Levels" and "Local Developer Discovers How to Code Without AI, Immediately Forgets."
This approach demonstrates the importance of treating AI models as specialized tools rather than general-purpose assistants. Each model performed the tasks it was best suited for, creating an efficient development pipeline.
For architects and teams implementing AI-assisted development, this shows the value of model specialization in workflows rather than using a single model for all tasks.
Key takeaways:
- Different AI models excel at different development tasks
- Orchestrator patterns can efficiently delegate tasks to specialized models
- Model specialization improves both quality and cost-effectiveness
Tradeoffs: This approach requires more sophisticated workflow management but delivers better results and cost efficiency.
Link: How I Vibe-Coded The Daily Token with Grok Code
Rapid Iteration and Problem Solving
TLDR: Specific issues were quickly resolved using AI, demonstrating the efficiency of low-cost models for targeted fixes.
During development, specific issues arose that were quickly resolved using AI assistance. The news ticker was scrolling too fast to read, which was fixed by asking the AI to slow it down. Mobile view issues were similarly addressed with targeted requests.
The efficiency of this approach was notable - fixes that might take 30 minutes of manual CSS debugging were completed in 30 seconds using AI assistance. This demonstrates the value of low-cost models for specific, well-defined tasks that developers could do themselves but would take significantly longer.
The approach also included adding easter eggs for developers, such as a console message styled like a terminal output that appears when developers open the browser console. This was achieved by showing the AI a tweet image and asking it to create a hidden easter egg with similar styling.
For architects and teams building with AI tools, this shows the importance of iterative refinement and the efficiency of using AI for targeted fixes rather than attempting perfect implementation in the first pass.
Key takeaways:
- Low-cost models excel at specific, well-defined tasks
- Iterative refinement with AI assistance is highly efficient
- Easter eggs and developer-focused features can enhance user experience
Tradeoffs: Projects can be refined quickly with AI assistance but require understanding of how to frame specific problems for AI tools.
Link: How I Vibe-Coded The Daily Token with Grok Code
Democratization Through AI Tools
TLDR: AI coding tools democratize development by enabling people with ideas but limited technical skills to build projects.
The project demonstrated that AI coding tools are democratizing development by enabling people with ideas but not all the technical skills to actually ship products. The developer noted that free Grok Code Fast unlocked a market of builders waiting to happen - people who know enough to be dangerous but need that boost to actually ship.
The final result was a fully functional, responsive satirical news site with animations and easter eggs built in just two hours for $4-8 in tokens - less than the cost of a San Francisco sandwich. This cost and time efficiency makes complex web development accessible to a broader range of creators.
The project proved that AI coding assistants aren't just toys or threats but democratizing tools that turn ideas into reality. The approach showed that while models may change, great workflows continue to provide value.
For architects and teams, this highlights the importance of building flexible workflows that can adapt to changing AI models while maintaining efficiency and effectiveness.
Key takeaways:
- AI tools democratize complex development tasks
- Cost and time efficiency make advanced projects accessible
- Flexible workflows provide lasting value beyond specific models
Tradeoffs: Projects can be built more efficiently but require investment in understanding AI tool workflows and capabilities.
Link: How I Vibe-Coded The Daily Token with Grok Code
Disclaimer
This newsletter summary was automatically generated. The content reflects the views of the original authors and not necessarily those of the generator. Please refer to the original sources for complete information and context.