/
Published on 23.02.2026
TLDR: Appwrite just shipped a Screenshots API that lets you capture any public webpage as an image with a single API call. No more wrestling with Puppeteer or Playwright infrastructure -- they handle the headless browsers so you do not have to.
Let us talk about something that every developer has encountered at least once: the deceptively simple task of taking a screenshot of a webpage programmatically. You think, "How hard can it be? Just render the page and grab an image." And then you spend the next three days configuring headless Chrome in a Docker container, fighting font rendering differences between your local machine and CI, dealing with animation timing, and wondering why that one CSS gradient looks different on every run.
Appwrite's new Screenshots API tackles this head-on. Instead of maintaining your own headless browser pipeline -- which, let us be honest, is infrastructure nobody wants to own -- you make a single API call and get back a pixel-perfect capture. The key word there is "managed." You are offloading all the environmental quirks, the browser version updates, the memory management of spinning up Chrome instances, to someone else's problem.
What makes this interesting from an architecture standpoint is the breadth of customization. You can control viewport dimensions, device scale factor, light or dark theme, locale, timezone, and even geolocation. That last one is particularly useful if you are building something that serves location-specific content and you need to verify what users in different regions actually see. You can simulate touch support and pre-grant browser permissions, which means you can screenshot pages that would otherwise show permission dialogs.
Now, where does this actually fit in a real workflow? Think link previews for your social features, automated visual regression testing, documentation that stays current with your actual UI, and web archiving. Appwrite mentions that Imagine, a platform they work with, is already using it in production for real-time project previews. That is a solid validation use case.
Here is what I think the article does not fully address: cost and rate limiting at scale. If you are generating thousands of screenshots for, say, an SEO tool or a monitoring dashboard, the economics matter enormously. The article also glosses over latency -- how long does a single capture take? For real-time preview generation, that number is critical. And there is no mention of how they handle JavaScript-heavy SPAs that take a while to fully render. Do you get a "wait for network idle" option? These are the questions a production team will ask on day one.
Link: Announcing Screenshots API: Generate pixel-perfect webpage screenshots on demand
TLDR: Remix Icon is a free, open-source icon library with over 3,200 neutral-style icons in both line and fill variants, available as SVG, PNG, web fonts, and framework-specific packages for React and Vue. All icons are free for personal and commercial use.
There is a particular kind of joy in finding an icon library that is comprehensive enough that you do not have to cobble together icons from three different sources and then spend an afternoon trying to make them look consistent. Remix Icon is making a strong case for being that library.
With over 3,200 icons on a 24x24 grid, each available in both outlined (line) and filled variants, you are looking at roughly 6,400 icon options. They are organized into practical categories: arrows, buildings, communication, design, development, devices, documents, finance, media, maps, and logos. The design philosophy is "neutral style," which in practice means they are clean, readable, and do not impose a strong visual personality on your interface. That is exactly what you want from a system icon set -- they should support your design, not compete with it.
The distribution story is where things get genuinely useful for frontend developers. You can grab them as raw SVG files, as PNG if you are in that situation, through web fonts, or as dedicated component packages for React and Vue 3. The React package is at @remixicon/react and Vue at @remixicon/vue, so you get proper tree-shaking and component-level imports instead of loading the entire icon set. There is also CDN support via jsDelivr, a Figma plugin for designers, and SVG sprite sheets if that is your preferred approach.
One thing worth noting is the licensing. They operate under the Remix Icon License v1.0, which was updated in January 2026. It permits both personal and commercial use, which is great, but I would encourage you to actually read the license rather than assuming it is identical to MIT or Apache 2.0. "Free for commercial use" and "do whatever you want" are not always the same thing, and the specifics matter if you are building a product.
What the post does not discuss is how Remix Icon compares to the other major players in this space -- Lucide, Heroicons, Phosphor, or even Material Symbols. Each has a different design philosophy, different component API ergonomics, and different approaches to customization. If you are choosing an icon library for a new project, the decision should factor in things like consistent stroke width, optical sizing, animation support, and how well the icons work at smaller sizes. Remix Icon checks a lot of boxes, but the ecosystem is competitive.