/
Published on 04.02.2026
TLDR: A front-end developer built a handy web-based tool for converting images to ICO favicons with live previews showing how they appear in browser tabs and Google search results. For SVG uploads, you can also tweak background colors and padding.
Summary:
You know that feeling when you are knee-deep in a project and suddenly realize your favicon looks like a pixelated mess in the browser tab? Kristjan Retter apparently felt that pain one too many times and decided to do something about it.
What sets this tool apart from the dozens of favicon generators already out there is the preview functionality. You can actually see how your favicon will render in a Chrome tab and in Google search results before you commit to it. That is surprisingly useful because favicons are one of those things that seem trivial until they look terrible at sixteen by sixteen pixels.
For those working with SVG files, the tool offers additional customization options including background color adjustment and padding controls. This addresses a common pain point where SVGs designed for larger displays do not translate well to tiny icon sizes without some tweaking.
The community response has been positive, with developers noting that the visualization features and configuration options distinguish it from simpler conversion tools. One commenter mentioned that generating proper ICO files has always been a headache, and having this kind of preview-first approach saves the trial-and-error cycle.
What I find interesting here is that this represents the kind of small, focused utility that solves a specific developer friction point. It is not trying to be everything to everyone. It just does one thing and does it well with thoughtful touches like the preview feature.
Key takeaways:
Link: Made a customisable img to ICO converter with Chrome/Google preview
TLDR: A discussion post comparing Git and GitHub generated debate about whether the comparison even makes sense, since one is a version control system and the other is a hosting service built on top of it.
Summary:
This one sparked some interesting discussion in the comments, and honestly, the meta-conversation about the comparison itself might be more valuable than the original comparison.
Several commenters pointed out that comparing Git to GitHub is a bit like comparing an engine to a car. Git is the underlying version control system - the engine that tracks changes, manages branches, and handles merges. GitHub is a service that hosts Git repositories and adds collaboration features like pull requests, issues, and project management tools on top.
The practical reality for most developers is that you install Git locally, work with it through your terminal or IDE, and then push to GitHub (or GitLab, or Bitbucket, or any other remote hosting service) when you want to share or back up your work. As one commenter noted, using both together gives you the best of both worlds.
What is missing from this discussion is the acknowledgment that for many newer developers, the distinction has become blurred precisely because GitHub has become so dominant. Many people learn Git specifically through GitHub's interface and tutorials, which can create confusion about where Git ends and GitHub begins.
The comments also revealed this is apparently a common interview question for junior developers. That is worth knowing if you are preparing for interviews - be ready to articulate the distinction clearly.
Key takeaways:
Link: Git vs GitHub
TLDR: An eleven-minute video tutorial walking through the transformation of functional but messy code into a professional, reusable C# library using proper naming conventions, consistent APIs, and smart abstraction layers.
Summary:
Zoran Horvat put together a solid video on library design that tackles a problem many developers face: you have code that works, but it is scattered, inconsistently named, and would be embarrassing to share as a package.
The tutorial uses Entity Framework Core code as its example, specifically code dealing with immutable entities. Starting from a collection of extension methods that grew organically over time, it demonstrates the refactoring process toward a cohesive library with clear interfaces.
The key principles covered include selecting descriptive names for classes and methods, maintaining consistent API patterns across the library, implementing design patterns like the repository pattern appropriately, and hiding implementation details behind clean abstractions. The end result is code with a minimal API surface area that is easy for consumers to understand and use correctly.
What I appreciate about this approach is the emphasis on the journey from working code to professional code. A lot of tutorials start with the clean version and work forward. Showing the messy starting point and the transformation process is more realistic and arguably more educational.
One thing worth considering that the video may not emphasize: library design is about predicting how others will use your code. That means thinking about edge cases, error handling, and documentation from the perspective of someone who does not have your context. The technical patterns matter, but empathy for the library consumer matters equally.
Key takeaways:
Link: How to Design a Reusable C# Library
TLDR: A shared article celebrating Laravel's position as a beloved PHP framework, highlighting its elegant syntax, comprehensive ecosystem, and the full range of projects it can handle from blogs to complex SaaS applications.
Summary:
Prashant Rijal shared some thoughts on why Laravel has captured the hearts of PHP developers, and at version twelve with over a decade of development, there is plenty to discuss.
The article points to Laravel's clean MVC architecture as a foundational strength. For teams working with PHP, having a clear separation between models, views, and controllers provides structure that scales. The Artisan CLI tools automate common tasks, Eloquent ORM simplifies database interactions, and the Blade templating engine makes view construction more pleasant.
Built-in security features are called out specifically, which is important. Laravel handles common vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and cross-site request forgery out of the box when you follow its conventions. That is not a small thing when many security breaches come from developers reinventing authentication or form handling poorly.
What the article emphasizes about developer experience resonates with Laravel's actual adoption story. PHP has had a reputation for messy code and security issues, and Laravel specifically addressed those pain points with opinionated conventions that guide developers toward better practices.
Now, what is not being said here: Laravel is excellent for many use cases, but it is not universally perfect. For extremely high-performance requirements, you might need to look elsewhere. For simple scripts, it is overkill. And the PHP ecosystem itself, while improved, still carries some baggage. Laravel is a great choice within its sweet spot, but understanding that sweet spot matters.
Key takeaways:
Link: Laravel has quickly become one of the most beloved PHP frameworks
TLDR: Carnegie Mellon mathematics professor Po-Shen Loh delivers a lecture on how education must evolve as AI capabilities advance, arguing that rote learning and even creativity alone will not be sufficient competitive advantages.
Summary:
Po-Shen Loh, who teaches mathematics at Carnegie Mellon, presented a thought-provoking lecture on preparing for artificial general intelligence. At twenty-six minutes, it is a substantial exploration of where education needs to go.
The starting point is striking: AI has already solved four of six problems from the International Math Olympiad. These are not routine calculations - these are problems specifically designed to test creative mathematical thinking. That should give pause to anyone who assumed human creativity would remain an unassailable advantage.
Loh makes an analogy that stuck with me: students using AI to do their homework is like driving instead of running for exercise. Sure, you get to your destination faster, but you are atrophying the very muscles you were supposed to be building. The homework was never really about the answers - it was about developing mental fitness through the struggle.
His proposed shift focuses on teaching students to evaluate and grade work rather than just complete it. When you grade homework, you develop critical evaluation skills and a deeper understanding of what quality looks like. This positions learning as developing judgment rather than just accumulating correct answers.
The emphasis on authentic collaboration and empathy as essential future skills is interesting. As routine cognitive tasks shift to AI, the uniquely human skills of working with others, understanding emotional context, and creating value through relationships become more important.
What Loh is avoiding, perhaps necessarily in a single lecture, is the economic and political complexity of this transition. Not everyone has equal access to quality education that develops these higher-order skills. The shift he describes could exacerbate existing inequalities if not addressed systemically.
Key takeaways: